|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: annathefootdoc
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 27 2009 5:40 am
Subject: Re: Video taken down due to Infringement
I had the exact same complaint but in the area of Feedback and
Suggestions. I had 4 videos I posted with different songs that were all removed so I ended up uploading some that have no ownership with WMG and used some of youtubes. yet those very songs I originally used are on literally hundreds of videos which I am sure that those snot nosed kids did not receive permission from the copyright owner to use their song in their video. it really makes me angry of the inequality of this all. Fine I can dig the fact mine was taken off for lack of permission but what about all the other videos who are are using it and they go unpunished. It isn't fair. i dont give a sh$t if it is money driven, bottom line is it is inequality. i say we should fight this. On May 12, 1:45 pm, drifter316 wrote:
> I just had a video taken down due to copyright infringement, ordered
> by EMI, however the video did not even have 700,000 views, and yet > many other videos of this music group are free to posted with millions > of views with no protest or take down order. I'm just wondering why > don't the companies take down these bigger videos if what they > disapprove of are people posting songs they do not own. Why dont they > post the songs themselves or videos themselves, why was i singled out > and hundreds of other videos are just left to be seen. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||