|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: BionTimeWorks
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 12 2009 11:49 pm
Subject: Re: Video taken down due to Infringement
It's money that what matters. Videos that were taken down are usually
not partners. The reason youtube doesn't take down any of these other higher viewed videos because they have a business deal with the owner of the videos. The question is that why would youtube defend the partners when EMI is a larger, more powerful business then a partner? Youtube and google get a profit from commercializing those higher viewed videos with ad revenue. That profit outweighs EMI's Copyright claim and possible lawsuit to youtube. But Youtuble buys the license to use the music for the video owner to use. But the reason why they don't bailout the small videos because its not profitable. Youtube only cares about the money. Not the user. All of this is in theory though and I don't really know what Youtube's true intentions are, but all of this does seem logicial for Youtube to do in my opinion. I hope this doesn't become another WMG lawsuit to Youtube again. But it probably will. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||