> God! I'm appalled at how much you still have to learn. Sadly, with
> your attitude, you never will.
Some people you can insult when you're wrong. Some that doesn't work
so well with.
If you are an engineer with his salt, you can tell us exactly how some
aspects of the counters work. For instance, obviously there is no
method whatever of compiling real-time counts. In most simple counters
(you've probably seen dozens of them too, haven't you?), of course
that's the last thing dispensed with; the usual problem is contention
for control of the subject resource.
Which of course is simple stuff for engineers who have out-learned
subordinate engineers. Now you tell us, why, if anyone has conquered
the problems of contention and concurrency, would they not readily
deploy the principles in any other tool set/language, even if that
involves SQL DBMS?
If you want to insult me further, I'd suggest you put your finger on
just what I don't know that I yet need to know to discuss this issue
competently.
Yep, attitude and learning are issues Mr. Fortran man.
so what youare saying is you want to see "Previously Viewed" under
videos you have never watched before? there has to be something
youtube can invent that will fix that. there has to be.
> On Apr 10, 4:53 pm, anmoose wrote:> God! I'm appalled at how much you still have to learn. Sadly, with
> > your attitude, you never will.
> Some people you can insult when you're wrong. Some that doesn't work
> so well with.
> If you are an engineer with his salt, you can tell us exactly how some
> aspects of the counters work. For instance, obviously there is no
> method whatever of compiling real-time counts. In most simple counters
> (you've probably seen dozens of them too, haven't you?), of course
> that's the last thing dispensed with; the usual problem is contention
> for control of the subject resource.
> Which of course is simple stuff for engineers who have out-learned
> subordinate engineers. Now you tell us, why, if anyone has conquered
> the problems of contention and concurrency, would they not readily
> deploy the principles in any other tool set/language, even if that
> involves SQL DBMS?
> If you want to insult me further, I'd suggest you put your finger on
> just what I don't know that I yet need to know to discuss this issue
> competently.
> Yep, attitude and learning are issues Mr. Fortran man.
OK, so every single video you see in the search results says
"Previously viewed" above it?
OH NOES! TEH ENDZ R NEER!
Seriously, I mean I know it makes it look bad, but this is at least
better than "Show comments above this level: (-5 or greater)"
disappearing temporarily, right?
OK, so you're saying that this is the worst thing that ever happened
to YouTube. OK, if you're THAT desperate, try clearing your browser's
cache, or clearing it's history.
> i have not seen certain videos but yet occasionally some will say
> "previously viewed". there has to be a way to turn this off. Please
> repluy. i desperately need help on this.
doesn't work. i tried that before and afer that i go back to the site
and the same ones that say "previously viewed" before stay that way.
this stinks. oh well.
> OK, so every single video you see in the search results says
> "Previouslyviewed" above it?
> OH NOES! TEH ENDZ R NEER!
> Seriously, I mean I know it makes it look bad, but this is at least
> better than "Show comments above this level: (-5 or greater)"
> disappearing temporarily, right?
> OK, so you're saying that this is the worst thing that ever happened
> to YouTube. OK, if you're THAT desperate, try clearing your browser's
> cache, or clearing it's history.
> On Mar 12, 3:20 pm, Paulgr wrote:
> > i have not seen certain videos but yet occasionally some will say
> > "previouslyviewed". there has to be a way to turn this off. Please
> > repluy. i desperately need help on this.- Hide quoted text -
> doesn't work. i tried that before and afer that i go back to the site
> and the same ones that say "previouslyviewed" before stay that way.
> this stinks. oh well.
> On Apr 12, 12:02 am, MasterOfTheVista wrote:
> > OK, so every single video you see in the search results says
> > "Previouslyviewed" above it?
> > OH NOES! TEH ENDZ R NEER!
> > Seriously, I mean I know it makes it look bad, but this is at least
> > better than "Show comments above this level: (-5 or greater)"
> > disappearing temporarily, right?
> > OK, so you're saying that this is the worst thing that ever happened
> > to YouTube. OK, if you're THAT desperate, try clearing your browser's
> > cache, or clearing it's history.
> > On Mar 12, 3:20 pm, Paulgr wrote:
> > > i have not seen certain videos but yet occasionally some will say
> > > "previouslyviewed". there has to be a way to turn this off. Please
> > > repluy. i desperately need help on this.- Hide quoted text -
Maybe somone watch in YT using your account secretly... a ghost maybe
O__O! lol joking xD.
Try to logg out from your account when you're finished & see if the
bug still accures when you log in the next time.
> God! I'm appalled at how much you still have to learn. Sadly, with
> your attitude, you never will.
> Have a nice day.
> On Apr 10, 7:41 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > On Apr 10, 4:29 pm, anmoose wrote:> On Apr 10, 6:38 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > > > I don't know what your field of expertise might be claimed to be,
> > > Electronic Engineering, Va. Tech, class of 65. I worked with IBM 360
> > > mainframes, punchcards, and Fortran 4, quite possibly while you were
> > > learning how to walk.
> > > The difference between us is that I *am* an engineer. A true engineer
> > > never assumes anything, nor do we ever pretend to know all there is to
> > > know, including how and why a specific counter works.....
> > If you were an engineer, you'd realize it is not an assumption *to
> > observe* that counters not only fail to provide real-time feedback and
> > counts with integrity... but that the processes which do so are of the
> > *simple, few* classes *which do so*. You and I both (should) know
> > you're hardly likely to have any Fortran experience which pertains to
> > C, C++, C#, GCC, Object Pascal, Perl, PHP techniques which respond
> > effectively to call-backs from remote clients, with potentially many
> > competing processes requiring exclusive write privileges to operate
> > effectively on a single data instance, likely even existing in SQL
> > data. Now, if you do have such relevant expertise, and particularly if
> > you excel at the craft of software engineering, it is only remarkable
> > that you presume software processes account for issues which they're
> > hardly reporting so comprehensively to you.
> > Still working in Fortran are you?- Hide quoted text -
I can try but i know i have been logged out before,even if it was
after cleaning my temp files out,and when i logged back in,the same
files read Previously Viewed.
> Maybe somone watch in YT using your account secretly... a ghost maybe
> O__O! lol joking xD.
> Try to logg out from your account when you're finished & see if the
> bug still accures when you log in the next time.
> On Apr 11, 2:53 am, anmoose wrote:
> > God! I'm appalled at how much you still have to learn. Sadly, with
> > your attitude, you never will.
> > Have a nice day.
> > On Apr 10, 7:41 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > > On Apr 10, 4:29 pm, anmoose wrote:> On Apr 10, 6:38 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > > > > I don't know what your field of expertise might be claimed to be,
> > > > Electronic Engineering, Va. Tech, class of 65. I worked with IBM 360
> > > > mainframes, punchcards, and Fortran 4, quite possibly while you were
> > > > learning how to walk.
> > > > The difference between us is that I *am* an engineer. A true engineer
> > > > never assumes anything, nor do we ever pretend to know all there is to
> > > > know, including how and why a specific counter works.....
> > > If you were an engineer, you'd realize it is not an assumption *to
> > > observe* that counters not only fail to provide real-time feedback and
> > > counts with integrity... but that the processes which do so are of the
> > > *simple, few* classes *which do so*. You and I both (should) know
> > > you're hardly likely to have any Fortran experience which pertains to
> > > C, C++, C#, GCC, Object Pascal, Perl, PHP techniques which respond
> > > effectively to call-backs from remote clients, with potentially many
> > > competing processes requiring exclusive write privileges to operate
> > > effectively on a single data instance, likely even existing in SQL
> > > data. Now, if you do have such relevant expertise, and particularly if
> > > you excel at the craft of software engineering, it is only remarkable
> > > that you presume software processes account for issues which they're
> > > hardly reporting so comprehensively to you.
> > > Still working in Fortran are you?- Hide quoted text -
Then it's one of YouTube bugs, I'm sure it will be fixed. I have
annoying bugs as well: can't chang the bg, can't change channel type,
advanced info is gone, my inbox is messed up..... I don't know til
when we wait for thses bugs to be fixed.
> I can try but i know i have been logged out before,even if it was
> after cleaning my temp files out,and when i logged back in,the same
> files read Previously Viewed.
> On May 6, 11:19 pm, sistersoh wrote:
> > HiPaulgr
> > Maybe somone watch in YT using your account secretly... a ghost maybe
> > O__O! lol joking xD.
> > Try to logg out from your account when you're finished & see if the
> > bug still accures when you log in the next time.
> > On Apr 11, 2:53 am, anmoose wrote:
> > > God! I'm appalled at how much you still have to learn. Sadly, with
> > > your attitude, you never will.
> > > Have a nice day.
> > > On Apr 10, 7:41 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > > > On Apr 10, 4:29 pm, anmoose wrote:> On Apr 10, 6:38 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > > > > > I don't know what your field of expertise might be claimed to be,
> > > > > Electronic Engineering, Va. Tech, class of 65. I worked with IBM 360
> > > > > mainframes, punchcards, and Fortran 4, quite possibly while you were
> > > > > learning how to walk.
> > > > > The difference between us is that I *am* an engineer. A true engineer
> > > > > never assumes anything, nor do we ever pretend to know all there is to
> > > > > know, including how and why a specific counter works.....
> > > > If you were an engineer, you'd realize it is not an assumption *to
> > > > observe* that counters not only fail to provide real-time feedback and
> > > > counts with integrity... but that the processes which do so are of the
> > > > *simple, few* classes *which do so*. You and I both (should) know
> > > > you're hardly likely to have any Fortran experience which pertains to
> > > > C, C++, C#, GCC, Object Pascal, Perl, PHP techniques which respond
> > > > effectively to call-backs from remote clients, with potentially many
> > > > competing processes requiring exclusive write privileges to operate
> > > > effectively on a single data instance, likely even existing in SQL
> > > > data. Now, if you do have such relevant expertise, and particularly if
> > > > you excel at the craft of software engineering, it is only remarkable
> > > > that you presume software processes account for issues which they're
> > > > hardly reporting so comprehensively to you.
> > > > Still working in Fortran are you?- Hide quoted text -
wow, in reading many of the forums, I'm wondering if you can answer
someone's concerns or questions without an air on condescension?? Not
everyone is internet savvy..not everyone is a "know it all"..you must
be youtubes wet dream. You have an answer for everything!
> God! I'm appalled at how much you still have to learn. Sadly, with
> your attitude, you never will.
> Have a nice day.
> On Apr 10, 7:41 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > On Apr 10, 4:29 pm,anmoosewrote:> On Apr 10, 6:38 pm, mikemontagne wrote:
> > > > I don't know what your field of expertise might be claimed to be,
> > > Electronic Engineering, Va. Tech, class of 65. I worked with IBM 360
> > > mainframes, punchcards, and Fortran 4, quite possibly while you were
> > > learning how to walk.
> > > The difference between us is that I *am* an engineer. A true engineer
> > > never assumes anything, nor do we ever pretend to know all there is to
> > > know, including how and why a specific counter works.....
> > If you were an engineer, you'd realize it is not an assumption *to
> > observe* that counters not only fail to provide real-time feedback and
> > counts with integrity... but that the processes which do so are of the
> > *simple, few* classes *which do so*. You and I both (should) know
> > you're hardly likely to have any Fortran experience which pertains to
> > C, C++, C#, GCC, Object Pascal, Perl, PHP techniques which respond
> > effectively to call-backs from remote clients, with potentially many
> > competing processes requiring exclusive write privileges to operate
> > effectively on a single data instance, likely even existing in SQL
> > data. Now, if you do have such relevant expertise, and particularly if
> > you excel at the craft of software engineering, it is only remarkable
> > that you presume software processes account for issues which they're
> > hardly reporting so comprehensively to you.
|
